Advances in dentistry within the last decade or so have resulted in incredible improvements. Dental implants have been the treatment of choice to replace missing or lost teeth, and success rates have significantly exceeded 95% if performed under proper technique. When the concept of osseointegration or fusing titanium with bone has been introduced into the dental area in the early 60s by an orthopedic surgeon known as P.I. Branemark, the use of this concept was adapted to dental usage; implementing the process, however, into a dental atmosphere was seen as unpredictable and insecure. Success rates at this time infrequently approached 55-60%, and several clinicians believed that their debut into an individual’s treatment program might be too early for the predictable success of a prosthesis. To enhance success rates, alterations in the design of the dental implant surface were introduced without clinical evidence to back-up producer’s claims of achievement rates. Through years of experimentation, there was a titanium dental implant designed that seemed similar to that of a normal tooth root.
Some 40 decades later, the technology inside the dental implant field has eased their colloquial use among general dentists and specialists. After the marketplace for implant dentistry burst not more than a decade ago, many implant producers decided to alter the topographical surface of the implant housing using unsubstantiated claims of improved success rates to acquire market share over the leading implant companies that currently hold 85-95% of US dental implant sales.
Regrettably, there’s an immense amount of poorly written research that is being introduced to the dental literature with false claims of improved success prices. In several instances, implant makers have made changes to the design of the implant because of success rates observed with a competitor implant that has the research and documentation. With the implant industry growing annually, this issue will never cease to exist. Accolade Dental Centre
As a potential enhancement candidate, there are several things you should know about this industry Before continuing with therapy:
FACT: Doctors don’t need formal surgical practice on people to place dental implants.
In fact, one implant manufacturer, in particular, holds educational conferences for physicians wishing to place dental implants within the course of a single weekend. That’s right, in only two days, physicians receive a surgical training certification which claims that they may place dental implants in an individual subject and have instruction in implant dentistry. Sad to say, the course does not train these physicians on individual subjects, rather, on plastic jawbones.
FACT: The US government does not require FDA approval to get a dental implant fixture to be promoted to the professional community.
The US government has a governing body which oversees biomedical devices and their possible implementation to the dental and medical community. If by way of instance, a dental implant fulfills specific criteria required for surgical placement into the human body based on prior submissions then the body will grant 510K clearance into the manufacturer. The 510K clearance allows dental implant manufacturers (along with other biomedical device manufacturers) to advertise their device without the need for previous animal or human testing! If another device has been introduced with a similar intention, then the literature for the first product can be used to formalize 510K clearance.
FACT: So many implants, so little time
The competition for the dental implant market is fierce, and after patents have expired on tested devices are proven to be more suitable for human use, some implant manufacturers will replicate the design of these devices. Implant manufacturers looking for a spot in the dental implant market will replicate the design of an implant that has an expired patent, save for a slight change here and here. These implants are known as clones and are promoted to dentists at a significantly reduced fee. Most of the time, these implant clones have absolutely NO clinical documentation to substantiate their manufacturer’s claims. In fact, these businesses utilize literature given from whom they’re currently copying!
FACT: Implant makers are introducing new designs into the market with false claims
To stay on top of new implant manufacturers that are having better overall success rates, some business copy a particular portion of the competitor’s implant and claim that outcomes are similar to the newly added portion. This makes sense, but in most cases, a mixture of design attributes are responsible for some manufacturers’ achievement prices that are enhanced. By introducing a concept that has demonstrated to boost success rates in another implant system (albeit with minimal if any clinical signs ), augmentation manufacturers can thereby retain their current clientele, and so doctors don’t need to be worried about having to purchase another implant system.
FACT: Clone companies consistently falter and eliminate market share, resulting in withdrawal from the market place.
Dental implants are metals and metals fatigue. A good number of implant manufacturers that have cloned systems with clinical documentation to the dental profession, can offer their product consequently and have gone bankrupt. Oftentimes when elements such as these implant systems fail, it is hard or nearly impossible to purchase replacement parts. This may leave the individual that has a cloned implant positioned in their jaw of not being able to have it restored, together with the unfortunate circumstance.
FACT: The US FDA does not require dental professionals to inform their patients of the type of dental implant is put.
You will find over 90 dental implant manufacturers currently competing for market share in the United States; within those 90 or so implant producers, more than 340 different implant designs are available!!!! Unfortunately, this number is growing, and at the years when implant components are necessary, it will be difficult for dentists to discern.
